Consoles vs PCs - Part 1: Price

This is something that has bothered me for a while now, I see a lot of people post on forums that consoles are cheaper than PCs, I just wanted to point out that this isn't necessarily the case.

There are some fundamental differences between consoles and PCs which affect the cost, first of all consoles use proprietary hardware where as the PC platform is open to any hardware combination that works. This means that the console hardware is owned by a specific business and they charge other businesses royalties to build games for that platform.

The knock on effect of this is that console manufacturers can offer up consoles that are not only cheap but cost more to produce than they sell for. A lot of people don't seem to realise that their brand new PS3 with Bluray player and cell processor was actually sold to them at a loss, this requires a massive investment from Sony but they recoup that cost over a number of years by claiming royalties from plethora of games sold.

So the core difference is that game development studios have to pay royalties, but this cost isn't simply absorbed out of their own profits, it's passed on to the consumer by increasing the price of the game.

In the UK brand new PC games tend to retail in the £25-£30 price range, and console games tends to retail at the £40-£50 price range. Here are some real world examples from www.play.com which is a popular online store for the UK:

Batman Arkham Asylum Xbox360 = £39.99
Batman Arkham Asylum PS3 = £39.99
Batman Arkham Asylum PC = £24.99

Wolfenstein Xbox360 = £39.99
Wolfenstein PS3 = £39.90
Wolfenstein PC = £24.99

The Godfather II Xbox360 = £39.99
The Godfather II PS3 = £39.99
The Godfather II PC = £24.99

X-Men Origins: Wolverine Xbox360 = £39.99
X-Men Origins: Wolverine PS3 = £39.99
X-Men Origins: Wolverine PC = £29.99

Across the 4 games for the PC we've saved a total of £55, that's an average saving of £13.75 per game. If you buy 1 game per month then you're looking at a saving of £165 per year, over the lifespan of a console which is usually about 5 years that's a saving of £825. This scales up, the more games you buy the bigger the saving.

To put this in perspective this saving could buy you an upgrade of an i7 920 CPU (£200), a decent motherboard (£150), 6Gb of RAM (£80), Nvidia GTX 295 (£350) with change to spare. This is an awesomely powerful system that would pound any console into the ground and provide a far superior gaming experience in terms of much better graphics and smoother more fluid game play.

So consoles are initially cheaper but you spend more on them over time. It's a lot like buying a car, a sensible adult recognises that different cars have different fuel consumptions and so some cost more to run over the years, in the long run the cheapest car may end up costing you more in fuel.

If you only ever intend to buy 2 or 3 games then a console is a great deal, if you're a regular gamer then the cost argument makes no sense.

-Princess_Frosty

Frosty's Blog.

A gaming blog by Sam "Frosty" Pickering, ranting about games since 1792.

Current rig: C2Q Q9450@3.6Ghz, 4Gb RAM, 2 4870s in crossfire, Velociraptor 300Gb Primary HDD, 3Tb Archive HDDs, Asus D2X Xonar, 30" WFP-HC Monitor, Antec1200 case, Lachesis Mouse & Exactmat, Lycosa Keyboard.



Comments for: Consoles vs PCs - Part 1: Price


Posted by: Ninjakamster on 30/03/2010 15:26:56
Keep up the good work man! : )

Posted by: PagingCraig on 20/11/2009 14:21:08
Please don't forget that people buy 40+ inch TVs and surround sound just for their console. For TV I either watch it on my PC or on my crappy 20something inch TV. I don't even have cable.

Posted by: DaitoX on 28/09/2009 18:13:08
@Ph0X Unreal Tournament 3 on the PS3. You can play it with keyboard and mouse, people can release new maps for it. Hell even totall conversions are possible (sony recently approved the tool for users to import new sounds into the game). So it is very much possible, developers just don't utilize it enough. Oh and also you can install linux on a PS3 (this is not possible with the slim version because of driver issues).

Posted by: GER on 23/09/2009 11:58:11
Great post, I used to think that I got scrwed for buying a PC because I kept on upgrading it part by part to meet up my taste for high performance. Instead I could've bought a PS3 and get equal performance for less cost. BUT this article proved that I was wrong, cost-wise I was better off buying the PC.

Posted by: Alias on 15/09/2009 14:00:34
I never thought of it that way... I just know I fail at using consoles. The cost argument is an excellent point to use when useless people consistently tell you consoles are cheaper and better. :)

Posted by: Ph0X on 13/09/2009 10:24:24
Well, let's not forget that PC can be used for way more than gaming, hence why it costs more. I know that with newer consoles you can browse the web and stuff too, but still, it doesn't get anywhere close to the PC. Also, another thing the PC is strong at that I love is community content. I know consoles started having them too (LittleBigPlanet) but it's still nowhere close to cs maps, source mods or wc3 games.

Posted by: Brissles on 08/09/2009 12:43:55
Consoles fail.

Post a new comment:


Name:    
Comment:  
Tick this box if you're human!